Legal Opinion

CARROLL v. MILLERSVILLE UNIVERSITY OF PA

District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania

Decided March 10, 2021No. 5:16-cv-01406Unknown

1Opinion

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA ARTIS C. CARROLL, JR. : CIVIL ACTION : v. : NO. 16-1406 : THOMAS RICHARDSON and : LORI AUSTIN : MEMORANDUM KEARNEY, J. March 9, 2021 Persons may sue to remedy a perceived wrong without counsel. But they must first properly serve the complaint and summons upon those they wish to hold responsible for the alleged wrong. We generally grant extensions to do so as we prefer to address the merits. We grant extensions upon good cause. But we today address claims by a pro se person who never served two parties after suing…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. Erickson v. PardusSupreme Court of the United States · 2007
  2. McNeil v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1993
  3. Kelley Mala v. Crown Bay MarinaCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2013
  4. Harry Franklin v. Ms. Murphy and Hoyt CuppCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1984
  5. John A. McCurdy Jr., M.D. John A. McCurdy Jr., M.D., Facs, Inc. v. American Board of Plastic SurgeryCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1998

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API