Legal Opinion

University City v. Miller

Missouri Court of Appeals

Decided July 27, 1971No. 33917PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

CLEMENS, Commissioner.

In the City’s municipal court defendant was found guilty of peace disturbance. On his appeal the case was tried de novo and at the close of evidence the circuit court granted defendant’s motion to dismiss because the City had failed to plead he had “wilfully” disturbed the peace, as proscribed by the ordinance. Now the City appeals, challenging the trial court’s refusal to allow it to amend after the evidence was closed.

We do not reach that issue since we have determined there was no valid charge against defendant and hence the municipal court was without jurisdiction.…

Also in this document: Per curiam.

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. State v. HaslerMissouri Court of Appeals · 1969
  2. State v. RoseSupreme Court of Missouri · 1968
  3. Kansas City v. MartinMissouri Court of Appeals · 1963
  4. State of Missouri v. NoellMissouri Court of Appeals · 1927
  5. State v. VandergriffSupreme Court of Missouri · 1966

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. City of Joplin v. GrahamMissouri Court of Appeals · 1984
  2. Kansas City v. GrahamMissouri Court of Appeals · 1973
  3. City of Florissant v. RouillardMissouri Court of Appeals · 1974
  4. City of Cape Girardeau v. JohnsonMissouri Court of Appeals · 1981
  5. State ex rel. St. Louis County v. GoekeMissouri Court of Appeals · 1980

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API