Baltimore & Ohio Chicago Terminal Railroad v. Illinois Commerce Commission
Appellate Court of Illinois
1Opinion of the CourtJustice Romiti
The respondent, the Baltimore and Ohio Terminal Railroad Company (Railroad), appeals from an order of the trial court affirming an order of the Illinois Commerce Commission establishing a grade crossing. We find that the Commission failed to consider what effect the interference with the railroad operation will have on the public convenience in general and remand for additional testimony as needed and further consideration.
On March 12,1973, the villages of Chicago Ridge and Oak Lawn filed a petition with the Illinois Commerce Commission requesting the establishment of a grade crossing over…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Public Service Commission v. Fort Wayne Union Railway Co.Indiana Supreme Court · 1953
- Choate v. Commerce CommissionIllinois Supreme Court · 1923
- Chicago & Northwestern Railway Co. v. Illinois Commerce CommissionIllinois Supreme Court · 1927
- Colaw v. University Civil Service Merit BoardAppellate Court of Illinois · 1975
- Yowell v. Cleveland, Cincinnati, Chicago & St. Louis Railway Co.Illinois Supreme Court · 1935
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- Commonwealth Edison Co. v. Illinois Commerce Comm'nAppellate Court of Illinois · 2014
- Knox Motor Service, Inc. v. Illinois Commerce CommissionAppellate Court of Illinois · 1979
- Commonwealth Edison Company v. Illinois Commerce CommissionAppellate Court of Illinois · 2014
- Alton Water Co. v. Illinois Commerce CommissionAppellate Court of Illinois · 1978
- Department of Transportation v. Soo Line RailroadAppellate Court of Illinois · 1991