Peterson v. State

ERVIN, Judge.

Appellant David Eugene Peterson appeals from his convictions for five counts of third degree burglary and the sentences imposed therefor. We affirm in part, reverse in part and remand.

Neither of appellant’s first two issues are meritorious. First, the stop was a valid traffic stop, because appellant’s vehicle was obstructing a roadway. Second, the trial judge’s resolution against appellant of the conflicting evidence dealing with the consensual search issue is supported by the record. See State v. Stephens, 441 So.2d 171 (Fla. 3d DCA 1983). Finally, appellant’s sentences1 were…