Legal Opinion

In the Interest of Sanders

Texas Court of Appeals, 7th District (Amarillo)

Decided April 25, 2005No. 07-03-0524-CVPublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

BRIAN QUINN, Justice.

Gail Wayne Sanders (Sanders) appeals from an order establishing his parentage as father of Brittany Nicole Sanders and ordering him to pay retroactive child support of $52,400, attorney’s fees, and court costs. Though not contesting paternity, he nonetheless attacks the trial court’s 1) failure to execute findings of fact and conclusions of law supporting its determination, 2) award of $52,400 as retroactive support, and 3) award of $8,000 as attorney’s fees. We affirm the judgment of the trial court.

Background

The dispute before us involves the attempt by Rolisa…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Fanning v. FanningTexas Supreme Court · 1993
  2. Garza v. Blanton, Texas Court of Appeals, 13th District2001
  3. Lubbock County Central Appraisal District v. Contrarez, Texas Court of Appeals, 7th District (Amarillo)2003
  4. Powell v. Swanson, Texas Court of Appeals, 1st District (Houston)1995

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. in the Interest of J.A.J., Texas Court of Appeals, 9th District (Beaumont)2009
  2. In Re JAJ, Texas Court of Appeals, 9th District (Beaumont)2009
  3. Pamela Smith v. Livingston Hearing Aid Center, Inc., Texas Court of Appeals, 7th District (Amarillo)2006
  4. Pamela Smith v. Livingston Hearing Aid Center, Inc., Texas Court of Appeals, 7th District (Amarillo)2006
  5. Pamela Smith v. Livingston Hearing Aid Center, Inc., Texas Court of Appeals, 7th District (Amarillo)2006

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API