Legal Opinion

Royal London Ltd. v. United States

United States Court of International Trade

Decided January 5, 1982No. Court No. 77-2-00229Published

1Opinion of the Court

Landis, Judge:

Pursuant to Hule 56 defendant moves and plaintiff cross-moves for summary judgment. The subject imported merchandise is small wooden boxes designed to hold men’s personal effects such-as jewelry, wallet, keys, and various other sundries.

The merchandise was classified and liquidated under TSUS item 204.40, as:

Jewelry boxes, silverware chests, cigar and cigarette boxes, microscope cases, tool or utensil cases, and similar boxes, cases, and chests, all the foregoing of wood:

Other:

Not lined -with textile fabrics_ 16%% ad val.

Plaintiff claims that the merchandise is more properly…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Annette Heyman v. Commerce and Industry Insurance CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1975
  2. Painton & Company, Ltd., Plaintiff-Appellee-Cross-Appellant v. Bourns, Inc., Defendant-Appellant-Cross-AppelleeCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1971
  3. S.S. Kresge Co. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1976
  4. American Greiner Electronic, Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1976

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API