Royal London Ltd. v. United States
United States Court of International Trade
1Opinion of the Court
Landis, Judge:
Pursuant to Hule 56 defendant moves and plaintiff cross-moves for summary judgment. The subject imported merchandise is small wooden boxes designed to hold men’s personal effects such-as jewelry, wallet, keys, and various other sundries.
The merchandise was classified and liquidated under TSUS item 204.40, as:
Jewelry boxes, silverware chests, cigar and cigarette boxes, microscope cases, tool or utensil cases, and similar boxes, cases, and chests, all the foregoing of wood:
Other:
Not lined -with textile fabrics_ 16%% ad val.
Plaintiff claims that the merchandise is more properly…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Annette Heyman v. Commerce and Industry Insurance CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1975
- Painton & Company, Ltd., Plaintiff-Appellee-Cross-Appellant v. Bourns, Inc., Defendant-Appellant-Cross-AppelleeCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1971
- S.S. Kresge Co. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1976
- American Greiner Electronic, Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1976