Legal Opinion
Morris Philip & K & J Trading Corp. v. Wildman Jasquard Co.
District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania
Decided December 9, 1963No. Civ. A. No. 22518PublishedCited by 3 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
KIRKPATRICK, District Judge.
This is an action for infringement of United States Reissue Patent No. 25,101 to Philip for a knitting machine comprising mechanism the purpose of which is to change the knitting pattern, as for example, from plain knitting to rib knitting or the reverse, without changing the operating speed of the machine.
The patent has 28 claims of which claims 20 and 21 — both of which are method claims — are the only ones in suit, it being conceded that the defendant’s “AI” machine, the operation of which is charged to be an infringement of the method claims, does not infringe…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Benger Laboratories, Limited v. RK Laros CompanyDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1962
- Black-Clawson Co. v. Centrifugal Engineering & Patents Corp.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1936
- Jacquard Knitting MacHine Co. v. Ordnance Gauge Co.District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1952
- In Re WashburnCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1950
3Cited by3 opinions
- Langsett v. Marmet CorporationDistrict Court, W.D. Wisconsin · 1964
- Morris Philip and K & J Trading Corp. v. Wildman Jacquard CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1964
- Philip v. Wildman Jacquard Co.Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1964