Legal Opinion

Bradbury v. IDAHO JUDICIAL COUNCIL

Idaho Supreme Court

Decided September 10, 2009No. 36175Published

1Opinion of the Court

233 P.3d 38 (2009)

John H. BRADBURY, Petitioner,

v.

IDAHO JUDICIAL COUNCIL, Respondent.

No. 36175.

Supreme Court of Idaho, Boise, July 2009 Term.

September 10, 2009.

Clements, Brown & McNichols, P.A., Lewiston; Runft & Steele Law Offices, PLLC, Boise; and M. Karl Shurtliff, Boise; for petitioner. Michael E. McNichols argued.

The Roark Law Firm, Hailey, for respondent. R. Keith Roark argued.

J. JONES, Justice.

District Judge John H. Bradbury (Petitioner) asks the Court to review a determination of the Idaho Judicial Council (Council) that he does not "actually reside" in Idaho County as required by…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. Liteky v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1994
  2. Sivak v. StateIdaho Supreme Court · 1986
  3. Microsoft Corp. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 2000
  4. Sweitzer v. DeanIdaho Supreme Court · 1990
  5. Higer v. HansenIdaho Supreme Court · 1946

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API