Legal Opinion

In the Matter of Harold W. Spence

Supreme Court of Georgia

Decided March 15, 1985No. Supreme Court Disciplinary 399PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Per curiam

Mr. Spence was charged with violation of Disciplinary Standards Nos. 4 and 45 of Bar Rule 4-102.

Mr. Spence received a retainer fee of $850 to represent Mr. Arthur W. Humphreys in a termination of employment case involving Riverside Manufacturing Company in Moultrie, Georgia. Mr. Humphreys specifically discussed with Mr. Spence the fact that there was a 180-day time limitation within which the complaint against Riverside must be filed and that the initial draft of the complaint prepared by Mr. Spence was inaccurate. Whereupon Mr. Humphreys revised the complaint and returned it to Mr. Spence…

2Cited by2 opinions

  1. Browner v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia · 1987
  2. In re SpenceSupreme Court of Georgia · 1999

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API