Legal Opinion

Matter of Hill

New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division

Decided May 31, 1990PublishedCited by 12 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

241 N.J. Super. 367 (1990)

575 A.2d 42

IN THE MATTER OF EDWARD HILL.

Superior Court of New Jersey, Appellate Division.

Argued May 14, 1990.

Decided May 31, 1990.

Before Judges COLEMAN, J.H., and BRODY.

Mary C. Beaumont, Deputy Attorney General, argued the cause for appellant (Robert J. Del Tufo, Attorney General of New Jersey, attorney; Mary C. Jacobson, Deputy Attorney General, of counsel; Mary C. Beaumont on the brief).

Robert A. Fagella argued the cause for respondent (Zazzali, Zazzali, Fagella & Nowak, attorneys; Robert A. Fagella of counsel and on the brief).

The opinion of the court was…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. In Re Estate of PfizerSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1951
  2. Alberti v. Civil Service CommissionSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1963
  3. Cabrera v. TronoloneNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1985
  4. Calcaterra v. CalcaterraNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1986

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. EC, LLC v. Planning Bd. of EastamptonNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 2002
  2. State v. AbeskaronNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1999
  3. In re RodriguezNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 2011
  4. In re Cafra Permit No. 87-0959-5New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1996
  5. DAVID PINCKNEY VS. CATHERINE DERY (FM-07-2588-12, ESSEX COUNTY AND STATEWIDE)New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 2020

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API