Legal Opinion

Samar, Inc. v. Hofferth

Indiana Court of Appeals

Decided April 26, 2000No. 71A04-9907-CV-315PublishedCited by 19 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

SHARPNACK, Chief Judge

Samar, Inc., appeals the trial court’s judgment in favor of Jack Hofferth in a breach of contract action. Samar raises two issues, which we restate as:

1) whether the trial court erred in awarding Hofferth a commission based on its finding that Samar had not entered into an exclusive right to sell listing contract following the expiration of the Samar-Hofferth listing agreement; and

2) whether Hofferth waived his right to a commission.

We affirm and remand for a determination of Hofferth’s reasonable appellate attorney fees.

The facts most favorable to the judgment…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Peoples Bank & Trust Co. v. PriceIndiana Court of Appeals · 1999
  2. Yin v. Society National Bank IndianaIndiana Court of Appeals · 1996
  3. Carnahan v. Moriah Property Owners Ass'nIndiana Supreme Court · 1999
  4. K Mart Corp. v. BrzezinskiIndiana Court of Appeals · 1989
  5. Ostrander v. Board of Directors of Porter County Education InterlocalIndiana Court of Appeals · 1995

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by19 opinions

  1. Thomas Hinc v. Lime-O-Sol CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2004
  2. Heritage Mutual Insurance v. Advanced Polymer Technology, Inc.District Court, S.D. Indiana · 2000
  3. Humphries v. AblesIndiana Court of Appeals · 2003
  4. Roy A. Miller & Sons, Inc. v. Industrial Hardwoods Corp.Indiana Court of Appeals · 2002
  5. Forty-One Associates, LLC v. Bluefield Associates, L.P.Indiana Court of Appeals · 2004

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API