Legal Opinion

Cigna Property & Casualty v. Ruiz

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Decided October 23, 2002No. 3D01-3314PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtGreen, J.

This is an appeal from an income deduction order requiring Cigna Property & Casualty (“Cigna”) to withhold certain sums owing to its insured, Antonio Ruiz, and to remit the same to Teresa Villar Ruiz, as child support for the Ruiz’s minor child. Cigna maintains that because the anti-alienation provision of the Longshore and Harbor Worker’s Compensation Act (“LHWCA”) under which Antonio Ruiz was receiving his benefits from Cigna exempted all claims of creditors, the income deduction order is erroneous. We do not agree that the anti-alienation provision of LHWCA is applicable to Ruiz’s child…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Wetmore v. MarkoeSupreme Court of the United States · 1904
  2. Bronk v. StateSupreme Court of Florida · 1901
  3. Gibson v. BennettSupreme Court of Florida · 1990
  4. Thibodeaux v. ThibodeauxSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1984
  5. Department of Revenue v. SpringerDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2001

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Cigna Property & Casualty v. RuizSupreme Court of the United States · 2003
  2. Cigna Property & Casualty v. RuizDistrict Court, S.D. Florida · 2003

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API