Legal Opinion

Thompson v. Package MacHinery Co.

California Court of Appeal

Decided December 20, 1971No. Civ. 37428PublishedCited by 24 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

HERNDON, J.

Plaintiff brought this action seeking recovery of damages for personal injuries allegedly sustained by her as a result of the defective design of a machine manufactured by defendant’s predecessor. She invokes the doctrine of strict liability.

The case was tried with a jury which returned a verdict for the defendant. Plaintiff appeals from the judgment contending that there were prejudicial errors in the trial court’s instructions. We have concluded that there is merit in plaintiff’s contentions and that a new trial should be ordered.

Statement of the Facts

At the time of her…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. Greenman v. Yuba Power Products, Inc.California Supreme Court · 1963
  2. Pike v. Frank G. Hough Co.California Supreme Court · 1970
  3. Warner v. Santa Catalina Island Co.California Supreme Court · 1955
  4. Grinnell v. Charles Pfizer & Co.California Court of Appeal · 1969
  5. Wright v. Massey-Harris, Inc.Appellate Court of Illinois · 1966

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by24 opinions

  1. Casrell v. Altec Industries, Inc.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1976
  2. Brown v. United States Stove Co.Supreme Court of New Jersey · 1984
  3. Henderson v. Harnischfeger Corp.California Supreme Court · 1974
  4. Luque v. McLeanCalifornia Supreme Court · 1972
  5. Balido v. Improved MacHinery, Inc.California Court of Appeal · 1972

19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API