Thompson v. Package MacHinery Co.
California Court of Appeal
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
HERNDON, J.
Plaintiff brought this action seeking recovery of damages for personal injuries allegedly sustained by her as a result of the defective design of a machine manufactured by defendant’s predecessor. She invokes the doctrine of strict liability.
The case was tried with a jury which returned a verdict for the defendant. Plaintiff appeals from the judgment contending that there were prejudicial errors in the trial court’s instructions. We have concluded that there is merit in plaintiff’s contentions and that a new trial should be ordered.
Statement of the Facts
At the time of her…
2Cases cited15 opinions
- Greenman v. Yuba Power Products, Inc.California Supreme Court · 1963
- Pike v. Frank G. Hough Co.California Supreme Court · 1970
- Warner v. Santa Catalina Island Co.California Supreme Court · 1955
- Grinnell v. Charles Pfizer & Co.California Court of Appeal · 1969
- Wright v. Massey-Harris, Inc.Appellate Court of Illinois · 1966
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by24 opinions
- Casrell v. Altec Industries, Inc.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1976
- Brown v. United States Stove Co.Supreme Court of New Jersey · 1984
- Henderson v. Harnischfeger Corp.California Supreme Court · 1974
- Luque v. McLeanCalifornia Supreme Court · 1972
- Balido v. Improved MacHinery, Inc.California Court of Appeal · 1972
19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.