Legal Opinion

(PC) Dao v. Campbell

District Court, E.D. California

Decided May 20, 2024No. 2:23-cv-01242Unknown

1Opinion

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 CUONG HUY DAO, No. 2:23-CV-1242-KJM-DMC-P 12 Plaintiff, 13 v. ORDER 14 DUSTIN CAMPBELL, et al., 15 Defendants. 16 17 Plaintiff, a prisoner proceeding pro se, brings this civil rights action pursuant to 18 42 U.S.C. § 1983. Pending before the Court is Plaintiff’s first amended complaint, ECF No. 9. 19 The Court is required to screen complaints brought by prisoners seeking relief 20 against a governmental entity or officer or employee of a governmental entity. See 28 U.S.C. 21 § 1915A(a). This…

2Cases cited25 opinions

  1. United Mine Workers of America v. GibbsSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
  2. Lopez v. SmithCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2000
  3. Michael Henry Ferdik v. Joe Bonzelet, SheriffCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1992
  4. George v. SmithCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2007
  5. Johnson v. DuffyCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1978

20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API