Legal Opinion
Commissioners of the State Insurance Fund v. Insurance Co. of North America
New York Court of Appeals
Decided November 19, 1992PublishedCited by 14 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION OF THE COURT
Memorandum.
The order of the Appellate Division should be modified, with costs to defendant Insurance Company of North America (INA), by reversing the grant of summary judgment to plaintiff State Insurance Fund (SIF) on the first cause of action and instead granting summary judgment to defendant dismissing that first cause of action and, as so modified, the Appellate Division order should be affirmed.
This is an action by one insurer, SIF, to recover from another insurer, INA, a pro rata contribution for a settlement paid in a personal injury action. The two insurers…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Dole v. Dow Chemical Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1972
- Seaboard Surety Co. v. Gillette Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1984
- Nassau Roofing & Sheet Metal Co. v. Facilities Development Corp.New York Court of Appeals · 1988
- Maurice Goldman & Sons, Inc. v. Hanover InsuranceNew York Court of Appeals · 1992
- Graphic Arts Mutual Insurance v. Bakers Mutual InsuranceNew York Court of Appeals · 1978
3Cited by14 opinions
- U.S. Underwriters Insurance v. Congregation B'nai IsraelDistrict Court, E.D. New York · 1995
- Merchants Mutual Insurance v. Laighton Homes, LLCSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 2006
- State v. Capital Mutual InsuranceAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1995
- North River Insurance Co. v. United National Insurance Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1993
- COMM'RS OF THE STATE INS. FUND v. Ins. Co. of N. Am.New York Court of Appeals · 1992
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.