State v. Horn
Supreme Court of Missouri
Appeal from Oregon Circuit Court. — Hon. W. N. Evans, Judge. (1) No objections were made or exceptions saved at the time to the admission or exclusion of evidence, and the defendant will not be heard to complain. State v. Taylor, 98 Mo. 245. (2) The only way exceptions can be saved to matters occurring during the trial is by bill of exceptions.
Read the full summary
Appeal from Oregon Circuit Court. — Hon. W. N. Evans, Judge. (1) No objections were made or exceptions saved at the time to the admission or exclusion of evidence, and the defendant will not be heard to complain. State v. Taylor, 98 Mo. 245. (2) The only way exceptions can be saved to matters occurring during the trial is by bill of exceptions. State v. Musick, 101 Mo. 260. (3) Not only must exceptions to errors occurring during the trial be preserved in and made a part of the bill of exceptions, but they must also be called to the attention of the trial court in the motion for a new trial.…
1Opinion of the CourtBurgkess, J.
At the October term, 1889, of the circuit court of Howell county the defendant was indicted for felonious assault committed on one John L. Matthews by stabbing him with a knife. At the *418July term, 1891, defendant made an application for a change of venue on account of prejudice of the inhabitants of Howell, Ozark and Douglass counties, which was granted by the court and the venue was changed to Oregon county. At the February term, 1892, of the Oregon circuit court the defendant was convicted and his punishment assessed at a fine of $100 and three months’ imprisonment in the county jail.…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- State v. WelsorSupreme Court of Missouri · 1893
- State v. MusickSupreme Court of Missouri · 1890
- State v. McDanielSupreme Court of Missouri · 1887
3Cited by1 opinion
- State v. ThomsonSupreme Court of Missouri · 1900