North Carolina State Bar v. Mulligan
Court of Appeals of North Carolina
1Opinion of the Court
HEDRICK, Chief Judge.
Defendant first contends “the Hearing Committee erred by refusing to consider the affidavit of Selwyn Rose upon objection by plaintiff when nine other affidavits were admitted without objection of plaintiff.” We disagree.
The record discloses the following: The affidavit which defendant’s counsel argues should have been admitted was that of Dr. Selwyn Rose, a psychiatrist in Winston-Salem, North Carolina who had conducted a psychological examination of defendant and interviewed him for approximately two hours on 10 November 1989, just five days prior to the hearing of this…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- State v. AgnewSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1978
- North Carolina State Bar v. SheffieldSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1985
- North Carolina State Bar v. SheffieldCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1985
- State v. MelvinCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1987
- Fidelity Bank v. GarnerCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1981
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- North Carolina State Bar v. LeonardCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2006
- North Carolina State Bar v. TalfordCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2001
- The North Carolina State Bar v. AdamsCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2015