Legal Opinion

Reich v. Kimnach

Supreme Court of Virginia

Decided June 13, 1975No. Record 740592PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the CourtCochran, J.

Charles A. Reich and Henry-Hanson-Tucker Realty Corporation (collectively, Reich), plaintiffs, filed in the trial court a second amended motion for judgment against Martha M. Kimnach, defendant, to recover a real estate commission of $4,525 for services alleged to have been rendered in procuring the sale of Kimnach’s property to Charles C. Skinner. The second amended motion for judgment alleged that Kimnach had employed William L. Murphy, trading as Bill Murphy Realty Company, to sell her property for the sum of $115,000, subject to real estate commissions of seven per cent; that Murphy had…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Arwood v. Hill's AdministratorSupreme Court of Virginia · 1923
  2. S. L. Nusbaum & Co. v. Atlantic Virginia Realty Corp.Supreme Court of Virginia · 1966
  3. W. D. Nelson & Co. v. Taylor Heights Development Corp.Supreme Court of Virginia · 1966
  4. Blankenship v. ChildressSupreme Court of Virginia · 1944
  5. Adelman v. CaputiSupreme Court of Virginia · 1971

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Murphy v. Nolte & Co., Inc.Supreme Court of Virginia · 1983

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API