Legal Opinion
Cawood v. Davis
Court of Appeals of Tennessee
Decided August 16, 1984PublishedCited by 25 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
PARROTT, Presiding Judge.
The plaintiff-appellant in this malicious prosecution action is F. Chris Cawood, an attorney licensed by the state of Tennessee. The defendant-appellee is Ronald Davis, who served as Disciplinary Counsel to the Board of Professional Responsibility (hereinafter, the Board) at the time relevant to this action. On October 12, 1981, pursuant to its authority under Rule 9 of the Rules of the Supreme Court, the office of Disciplinary Counsel petitioned the Board to appoint a panel which would hear evidence on nineteen allegations of misconduct lodged against Cawood.…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Robert N. Kissell and Beverly J. Kissell v. Sheldon A. BreskowCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1978
- Clulow v. State Of OklahomaCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1983
- Kilbourne v. HanzelikTennessee Supreme Court · 1983
3Cited by25 opinions
- Pendleton v. MillsCourt of Appeals of Tennessee · 2001
- Jeffries v. Tennessee Department of CorrectionCourt of Appeals of Tennessee · 2002
- Armoneit v. Elliott Crane Service, Inc.Court of Appeals of Tennessee · 2001
- Davis v. CampbellCourt of Appeals of Tennessee · 2001
- Ferguson v. Nationwide Property & Casualty Insurance Co.Court of Appeals of Tennessee · 2006
20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.