Legal Opinion
State v. Wilder
Court of Appeals of Arizona
Decided January 15, 1975No. 2 CA-CR 390PublishedCited by 6 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
HATHAWAY, Chief Judge.
Appellant is challenging the denial of his motion for a new trial as well as claiming a deprivation of effective assistance of counsel. We find his contentions have no merit and affirm.
The facts in this case are those of State v. Wilder, 18 Ariz.App. 410, 502 P.2d 1087 (1972). In addition to those facts, we must point out in relation to the instant case that a polygraph examination was administered to Jack Cusick by an officer of the Arizona Department of Public Safety in January 1971. The county attorney’s office in Cochise County was advised by the officer that…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- Brady v. MarylandSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
- Giglio v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
- Giles v. MarylandSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
- State v. ValdezArizona Supreme Court · 1962
- Milton M. Levin v. Ramsey Clark, Attorney General of the United StatesCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1968
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- State v. DumaineArizona Supreme Court · 1989
- State v. WatsonArizona Supreme Court · 1976
- State v. StanleyCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1979
- State v. LaBarreCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1977
- State v. KellyCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1978
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.