Legal Opinion

In re Hotchkiss

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided June 3, 1910No. Appeal No. 3Published

‘ Appeal by The New York and Hew England Underwriters at Lloyds Of. New York City from an order of the Supreme Court, made at the New York Special Term and entered in the office of the clerk of the county of New York on the 25th day of August, 1909, restraining the appellant from, changing its name.

1Opinion of the Court

Scott,, J.:

The appeal should be dismissed, with ten dollars costs and disbursements, for the reasons stated in Matter of Hotchkiss, No. 2 (138 App. Div. 877), decided herewith.

Ingraham, P. J., McLaughlin, Clarke and Dowling, JJ., concurred. .

Appeal dismissed, with -ten dollars costs and disbursements.

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. In re HotchkissAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1910