Legal Opinion
Werts v. Luzerne Borough Authority
Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania
Decided December 11, 1974No. Appeal, No. 573 C.D. 1974PublishedCited by 13 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion by
Judge Mencer,
As our Supreme Court has stated in Budget Laundry Co. v. Munter, 450 Pa. 13, 17, 298 A. 2d 55, 56 (1972), “[t]his type of appeal provides maximum difficulty for an appellate court.”
It arises out of the condemnation by the Borough of Luzerne of certain property of the appellants and the filing of a Declaration of Taking with the Court of Common Pleas of Luzerne County on January 15, 1974. On *633February 15, 1974, the condemnees, appellants herein, filed preliminary objections under Section 406 of the Eminent Domain Code, Act of June 22, 1964, P. L. 84, 26 P.S. §1-406. The…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Budget Laundry Co. v. MUNTERSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1972
- McKay v. BeattySupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1943
- McFadden v. Pennzoil CompanySupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1937
- Arzinger v. BaughmanSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1943
- National Finance Corp. v. BergdollSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1930
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by13 opinions
- Byard F. Brogan, Inc. v. Holmes Electric Protective Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1983
- North Penn Water Authority v. a Certain Parcel of Land Identified by Last Known Owner & Tax Parcel Number as MalinCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1994
- Laczkowski v. LaczkowskiSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1985
- Municipal Authority of the Borough of Midland v. Ohioville Borough Municipal AuthorityCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 2015
- Hesselgesser v. Glen-Craft Contractors, Inc.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1981
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.