Legal Opinion

Ex parte Dixon

Utah Supreme Court

Decided January 15, 1875PublishedCited by 2 opinions

ApplioatioN by petition to the Supreme Court to be' released on writ of habeas corpus. The material facts appear in the Opinion.

1Opinion of the CourtEmerson, J.

The return to the writ of habeas corpus does not controvert the facts stated in the petition. ’ From the petition and return, it appears that petitioner was arrested at Ogden, in the County of Weber, on an order of arrest made by a Justice of the Peace of Salt Lake City and County, endorsed on a summons issued by him on an indebtedness on a contract.

The summons was issued aud the' order of arrest made oh the 10th day of January, 1875, and the summons was returnable on the 21st .day of the same month, and was served' by a constable of Salt Lake City. A judgment appears to have been rendered in…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Ex parte McCulloughCalifornia Supreme Court · 1868
  2. Howard v. PeopleMichigan Supreme Court · 1854

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Ahlrep v. HughesWyoming Supreme Court · 1909
  2. Winward v. StateUtah Supreme Court · 2012

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API