Legal Opinion

Hartline v. Mutual Ben. Health & Accident Ass'n

Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit

Decided June 8, 1936No. 8049PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

SIBLEY, Circuit Judge.

The declaration of the plaintiff-appellant was dismissed on demurrer. It sought recovery in three counts on a contract of accident insurance because of the accidental death on December 22, 1934, of the insured, her husband; she being named beneficiary. The first count sets up that on December 14, 1934, the insured was solicited by a named agent of the defendant-appellee to take insurance described fully in a prospectus exhibited to insured and made a part of the declaration. “Plaintiff avers that said Hartline (insured) having been fully informed of rhe terms' and…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Pacific Mut. Life Ins. Co. of California v. BartonCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1931

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. A. L. Perper v. Abraham M. Sonnabend and Whitehall Hotel & Surf CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1955
  2. Hartline v. Mutual Benefit Health & Accident Ass'nCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1938
  3. Nichols v. Republic Iron & Steel Co.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1937

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API