Legal Opinion

Everett v. Philibert

Louisiana Court of Appeal

Decided May 8, 2009No. 2008 CA 2270PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtDowning, J.

[gPlaintiffs, Aldon and Eloyce Everett, appeal a judgment granting Essex Insurance Company’s (Essex’s) motion for summary judgment. In the judgment the trial court ruled that the Commercial General Liability (CGL) policy issued by Essex to Gordon N. Philibert and Bel Oaks Build ers, Ine., (collectively, Bel Oaks), provided no coverage for the tort claims alleged in plaintiffs’ petition. The trial court also ruled that Essex had no duty to defend Bel Oaks against those claims. For the following reasons, we affirm the trial court judgment.

PACTS AND PROCEDURAL HISTORY

This litigation arises out…

Also in this document: Concurrence.

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Holmes v. HendricksLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1926
  2. Supreme Services v. Sonny Greer, Inc.Supreme Court of Louisiana · 2007
  3. Borden, Inc. v. Howard Trucking Co., Inc.Supreme Court of Louisiana · 1984
  4. Franklin v. Able Moving & Storage Co., Inc.Louisiana Court of Appeal · 1983
  5. In Re St. Louis Encephalitis OutbreakLouisiana Court of Appeal · 2006

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Wadick v. General Heating & Air Conditioning, LLCLouisiana Court of Appeal · 2014
  2. Wilson v. Two SD, LLCLouisiana Court of Appeal · 2015
  3. Perniciaro v. McInnisLouisiana Court of Appeal · 2018
  4. Looney Ricks Kiss Architects, Inc. v. State Farm Fire & Casualty Co.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2012
  5. Provost v. Homes by Lawrence & Pauline, Inc.Louisiana Court of Appeal · 2012

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API