Carroll v. Hertz Corp.
District Court of Appeal of Florida
1Opinion of the Court
PEARSON, TILLMAN, Chief Judge.
The trial judge entered judgment for the defendants upon a verdict of the jury which read as follows:
“We, the Jury, find for the plaintiff, Nettie Pearl Carroll, against the Defendants and access [sic] her damages at None Dollars.”
The plaintiff has appealed and raised four points; three of which are based upon assignments directed to rulings by the trial judge during the trial. We find no error, but the fourth point merits discussion.
Plaintiff’s fourth point is:
“It was prejudicial error to enter final judgment for defendants on the verdict of 'no damages’ which…
2Cases cited1 opinion
- Glassman v. Deauville Enterprises, Inc.District Court of Appeal of Florida · 1958
3Cited by6 opinions
- Fmw Properties v. Peoples First Fin.District Court of Appeal of Florida · 1992
- Putman v. PutmanDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1963
- Singer v. BorbuaDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1986
- Raffel v. MagarianDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1964
- Blue v. WilliamsDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1967
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.