Legal Opinion

Brandon v. Claxton

Court of Appeals of Texas

Decided June 28, 1930No. 10453PublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtLooney, J.

Plaintiffs in error and defendants in error will be referred to as plaintiffs and defendants, respectively. Plaintiffs, as assignees of the Puller Construction Company, sued O. G. Claxton for debt on a paving certificate issued by the city of Dallas to the Construction Company as contractor for street improvement, and to foreclose, as to all defendants, the lien authorized by the charter of the city, also a mechanic’s lien given by Claxton and wife to the contractor for the improvement. Foreclosure was sought against Claxton, as maker of the mechanic’s lien contract and as owner, at the time…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Gibson v. ChouteauSupreme Court of the United States · 1872
  2. Peyton v. DesmondCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1904
  3. Storrie v. Houston City Street Railway Co.Texas Supreme Court · 1898
  4. Knapp v. Alexander-Edgar Lumber Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1915
  5. Krakow v. WilleWisconsin Supreme Court · 1905

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. Cain v. StateCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1994
  2. Claxton v. BrandonTexas Supreme Court · 1932
  3. Graham v. LetotCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1937
  4. Cain v. StateCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1994
  5. Jay v. Nesco Acceptance Corp. (In Re Jay)District Court, N.D. Texas · 2003

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API