Legal Opinion

Marshall A. Contee v. United States

Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit

Decided February 14, 1969No. 21693_1PublishedCited by 32 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

BAZELON, Chief Judge:

Appellant murdered his wife with an ax in their bedroom during the night and turned himself in to the police. His principal defense at trial was insanity, *250though he also denied premeditation. On this appeal from his conviction for murder in the first degree, he contends that the trial court erred in benying his request for bifurcation of the trial on the merits from the trial on the issue of criminal responsibility, under Holmes v. United States, 124 U.S.App.D.C. 152, 363 F.2d 281 (1966).

In support of his pre-trial motion for a bifurcated trial, defense counsel told the…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Ernest W. Harried v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1967
  2. Walter Lee Parman v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1968
  3. Frank W. Holmes v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1966
  4. Henry E. Higgins v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1968

3Cited by32 opinions

  1. United States v. Lavance Greene, United States of America v. Randolph GreeneCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1974
  2. Houston v. StateAlaska Supreme Court · 1979
  3. United States v. William BennettCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1972
  4. State v. BoydWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1981
  5. State v. DaggettWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1981

27 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API