Legal Opinion

Hageman v. Hageman

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided October 6, 1989Published

1Opinion of the Court

Order unanimously modified as an exercise of discretion without costs and as modified affirmed, in accordance with the following memorandum: As a general rule a speedy trial is the proper avenue for correction of any inequities in an order pendente lite (see, Wesler v Wesler, 133 AD2d 627, 628; Berger v Berger, 125 AD2d 285; Baker v Baker, 120 AD2d 374, 376; Messina v Messina, 101 AD2d 856). Here, however, we exercise our discretion to grant the relief sought by defendant to the extent of modifying the July 13, 1988 order by omitting the decretal paragraph that directs the defendant to pay…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Wesler v. WeslerAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1987
  2. Osserman v. OssermanAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1983
  3. Messina v. MessinaAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1984
  4. Baker v. BakerAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1985
  5. Berger v. BergerAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1986

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API