R. M. Hollingshead Co. v. Bassick Mfg. Co.

In 50 F.(2d) 592, we dismissed this appeal because we thought we wore asked only to review a declaratory judgment. On this rehearing application, it is insisted that the appeal rightly covered other features, and required decision on the merits.

We thought the only contention intended to be made on the appeal (as to Gullborg) was that no contributory infringement would arise by using in the combination a coupler like Exhibits A, B, and F before the master, in which there was nothing of the Gullborg suction effect. Indeed, we were told that we might disregard all other assignments of error and…