Legal Opinion
Tammy Phillips v. Kevan Gilman
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Decided November 25, 2020No. 19-60056Unpublished
1Opinion of the Court
NOT FOR PUBLICATION FILED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS NOV 25 2020 MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK U.S. COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT TAMMY R. PHILLIPS, et al., No. 19-60056 Appellants, BAP No. 18-1100 v. MEMORANDUM* KEVAN HARRY GILMAN, et al., Appellees. TAMMY R. PHILLIPS, et al., No. 19-60057 Appellants, BAP No. 18-1101 v. KEVAN HARRY GILMAN, Appellee. TAMMY R. PHILLIPS, et al., No. 19-60058 Appellants, BAP No. 18-1066 v. KEVAN HARRY GILMAN, Appellee. * This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3. Appeal from the…
2Cases cited18 opinions
- United States v. HinksonCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2009
- Moreno v. City of SacramentoCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2008
- TrafficSchool.com, Inc. v. Edriver Inc.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2011
- Batzel v. SmithCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2003
- In Re Carol Freeman Marsch, Debtor (Two Cases). John D. Marsch, Claimant-Appellant v. Carol F. Marsch, (Two Cases)Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1994
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.