People v. Manago
California Court of Appeal
[Opinion certified for partial publication.*]
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
HOLLENHORST, Acting P. J.
A jury convicted Stewart Manago of residential burglary (Pen. Code, § 459), residential robbery (Pen. Code, §211), and rape (Pen. Code, § 261, subd. (2)), during all of which he used a gun (Pen. Code, §§ 12022.5 and 12022.3). He was sentenced to prison and appeals contending his motions to represent himself and for mistrial were erroneously denied, an in camera hearing was improperly conducted, evidence was erroneously admitted and sentencing error occurred. We reject his contentions 1 and affirm.
Facts
Manago and a companion were waiting in front of the victim’s…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- Johnson v. ZerbstSupreme Court of the United States · 1938
- Faretta v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1975
- Adams v. United States Ex Rel. McCannSupreme Court of the United States · 1943
- In Re LifschutzCalifornia Supreme Court · 1970
- Massey v. MooreSupreme Court of the United States · 1954
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by12 opinions
- People v. WelchCalifornia Supreme Court · 1999
- People v. TaylorCalifornia Supreme Court · 2009
- Oxy Resources California LLC v. Superior CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2004
- People v. PoplawskiCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1994
- People v. NautonCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1994
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.