Smith v. Smith
Indiana Supreme Court
ERROR to the Tippecanoe Circuit Court.
1Opinion of the CourtBlackford, J.
Assumpsit. The declaration states that. on the 17th day of June, 1844, at, &c., the plaintiff, H. B. Smith, at the request of the defendants trading under the name of Smith and Hazard, bargained with and agreed to buy of the defendants, and the defendants then and there sold to the plaintiff, 1,000 barrels of salt to be delivered to him at Lafayette, one-half on or before the first of Augtist then next, and one-half on or before the first of September next, or as much sooner as the defendants might .wish, áre.; and, upon the delivery of every part,, the plaintiff agreed to pay one dollar and…
2Cases cited1 opinion
- Barickman v. KuykendallIndiana Supreme Court · 1841
3Cited by11 opinions
- Peoria Marine & Fire Insurance v. WalserIndiana Supreme Court · 1864
- Foltz v. EvansIndiana Court of Appeals · 1943
- Newby v. RogersIndiana Supreme Court · 1872
- McMillen v. TerrellIndiana Supreme Court · 1864
- Adams v. DaleIndiana Supreme Court · 1868
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.