Legal Opinion
York Golf and Tennis Club v. Tudor Ins. Co.
Supreme Judicial Court of Maine
Decided April 9, 2004No. Yor-03-481PublishedCited by 15 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtCalkins, J.
[¶ 1] York Golf and Tennis Club and its directors appeal from the summary judgment entered by the Superior Court (York County, Fritzsche, J.). Although the club was successful in obtaining a declaration that Tudor Insurance Company had a duty to defend it in a lawsuit brought by Francis Reilly, the club and its directors appeal the amount of damages and the denial of attorney fees. Tudor cross-appeals the declaration that it had a duty to defend the club pursuant to its insurance policy. We agree with Tudor that it had no duty to defend, and we vacate the judgment.
I. BACKGROUND AND PROCEDURE
[¶…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Travelers Indemnity Co. v. DingwellSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1980
- Gibson v. Farm Family Mutual InsuranceSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1996
- McLaughlin v. Superintending School CommitteeSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 2003
- Foundation for Blood Research v. St. Paul Marine & Fire InsuranceSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1999
3Cited by15 opinions
- School Union No. 37 v. United National InsuranceCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 2010
- Dawn M. Harlor v. Amica Mutual Insurance COmpanySupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 2016
- PRIME TANNING CO., INC. v. Liberty Mut. Ins. Co.District Court, D. Maine · 2010
- Medical Mutual Insurance Co. v. BurkaCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 2018
- Lyman Morse Boatbuilding, Inc. v. Northern Assurance Co. of AmericaCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 2014
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.