Kellogg v. Illinois Central Railroad
Supreme Court of Iowa
1Opinion
Kellogg was a purchaser at the mortgage foreclosure sale. As 4. MORTGAGES: such purchaser, he took the entire title that foreclosure: the mortgagor had in said premises, as of the title date of the execution of the mortgage. In acquired by McElroy v. Allfree, 131 Iowa 112, it is purchaser. said:
"The purchaser becomes privy in estate with the mortgagor with respect to the title as it existed when the mortgage was executed * * *."
This is the general rule of the authorities. Hokanson v.Gunderson, 54 Minn. 499 (56 N.W. 172); 27 Cyc. 1791, Section e;Bateman v. Kellogg, 59 Cal.App. 464 (211 P. 46);…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Bateman v. KelloggCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1922
- Meier v. MeierSupreme Court of Missouri · 1891
- Hokanson v. GundersonSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1893
- McNutt v. Nuevo Land Co.California Supreme Court · 1914
- Gamble v. HorrMichigan Supreme Court · 1879
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.