Legal Opinion
Chesapeake & Ohio Ry. Co. v. Pittsburg Steel Foundry Co.
Ohio Court of Appeals
Decided March 8, 1926PublishedCited by 1 opinion
1Opinion of the CourtHamilton, J.
Defendant in error, the Pittsburg Steel Foundry Company, brought suit in the court below against the Chesapeake & Ohio Railway Company, seeking to recover in an action for money on an account for steel castings furnished by the Foundry Company to the Railway Company.
It appears that under the orders given 738 steel frames were manufactured and delivered by the Foundry Company, and, after delivery, 339 were reported by the Railway Company to be defective, and were rejected by it. The value of these rejected frames makes up the balance claimed to be due on the account, for which payment was…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Pierson v. . CrooksNew York Court of Appeals · 1889
- Reed v. . RandallNew York Court of Appeals · 1864
- Studer v. . BleisteinNew York Court of Appeals · 1889
- Waeber v. . TalbotNew York Court of Appeals · 1901
- Gentilli v. . StaraceNew York Court of Appeals · 1892
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- United States v. Juan Hernandez-ZozayaCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2020