J.R.A. Inc. v. Essex Insurance Co.

Ill concur, reluctantly but practically, in the judgment.

This business, J.R.A., Inc., lost two buildings which were insured by Essex Insurance on the date of Hurricane Katrina. We are now virtually six years after the storm. I am uninterested in further *890delaying the resolution of this matter on procedural niceties.

As the concurring opinion of JUDGE TOBIAS makes clear, the language of the judgment itself is deficient. There is no decretal language. “A final appealable judgment must contain decretal language, and it must name the party in favor of whom the ruling is ordered, the party against…