Legal Opinion

Hodgdon v. S. Pac. R.R Co.

California Supreme Court

Decided April 27, 1888No. 11357PublishedCited by 1 opinion

Appeal from an order of the Superior Court of the city and county of San Francisco refusing an amendment to a notice of intention to move for a new trial. The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.

1Opinion of the CourtMcFarland, J.

There were several defendants in this action, and judgment went in the court below for plaintiff. A notice of intention to move for a new trial was served and filed by all of the defendants except Leland Stanford and C. P. Huntington, whose names were omitted from the notice. Afterwards, and after the statutory time for filing such a notice had expired, the defendants moved the court to correct said notice by inserting therein the names of said defendants Stanford and Huntington, on the ground of accident, inadvertence, etc. Affidavits were filed on the motion by both sides, and the court…

2Cited by1 opinion

  1. Banta v. SillerCalifornia Supreme Court · 1898

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API