Legal Opinion

State v. Killam

Supreme Court of New Hampshire

Decided April 28, 1993No. 92-015PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtBrock, C.J.

The defendant, Duane Killam, was found guilty after a jury trial in the Superior Court (Perkins, J.) on two counts of aggravated felonious sexual assault. RSA 632-A:2 (Supp. 1989). He filed a motion for a new trial alleging ineffective assistance of counsel and newly discovered evidence. The trial court conducted a hearing and denied the motion in an extensive written order. On appeal, the defendant claims that the trial court erred when it (1) found that defendant’s counsel was not ineffective, and (2) failed to grant a new trial based on new evidence. We affirm.

The defendant was convicted…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Strickland v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
  2. Chambers v. MississippiSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
  3. State v. BallSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1983
  4. State v. FaragiSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1985
  5. State v. BoisvertSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1979

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Simpson v. CalivasSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1994
  2. Flanagan v. PrudhommeSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1994
  3. State v. DewittSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1998
  4. State v. LaforestSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1995
  5. State v. SanchezSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1995

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API