Legal Opinion

Roberts v. Roberts

Supreme Court of South Carolina

Decided March 9, 1982No. 21667PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

Harwell, Justice:

This is a consolidation of two appeals from Family Court. The first appeal taken by appellant Roberts is from an order granting the respondent $400 a month alimony, appointing a sequestrator to assure that payments from Roberts’ United States Retirement Fund is sent directly to respondent, and awarding respondent fees for her attorney and the sequestrator. The second appeal is from an order holding both appellants in contempt of court — Roberts for not paying alimony as ordered and Roberts’ attorney, Joiner, for interfering with the court’s order concerning the Retirement…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. McKenzie v. McKenzieSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1970

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Dunson v. DunsonSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1982

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API