Legal Opinion · Dissent

Hershenow v. Enterprise Rent-A-Car Co.

Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court

Decided January 17, 2006Published

1DissentGreaney, J.

(dissenting, with whom Spina, J., joins). We have before us an agreement, drafted and used by the defendant, a national car rental company, which contains restrictions on collision damage waivers (CDWs) sold to its customers that are patently in violation of G. L. c. 90, § 32E ½, and, as a result, in violation of G. L. c. 93A, §§ 2 (a) and 9. Despite the defendant’s efforts to characterize the unfair and deceptive provisions as a “mistake,” the provisions were inserted, apparently intentionally, to cancel, in defined circumstances, the right of a purchaser of a CDW to recover on its…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Linthicum v. ArchambaultMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1979
  2. Aspinall v. Philip Morris Companies, Inc.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 2004
  3. Leardi v. BrownMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1985
  4. Van Dyke v. St. Paul Fire & Marine Ins. Co.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1983
  5. Baldassari v. Public Finance TrustMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1975

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API