Legal Opinion

State Ex Rel. Britton v. Harris

Supreme Court of Alabama

Decided August 6, 1953No. 4 Div. 707PublishedCited by 12 opinions

1Per curiam

This is an action in the nature of a quo warranto filed by the State on the relation of Hugh Britton, who joins as plaintiff under the provisions of section 1136, Title 7, Code of 1940, against J. D. Harris, Otis Taff and Roy Greene, to oust said defendants from the office of city commissioners of Phenix City, Alabama, for that they are usurping, intruding into and without authority of law are exercising or claiming to exercise the “pretended offices” of city commissioners of said city.

The complaint is grounded on the averments made therein that the local act creating a five member commission…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. People Ex Rel. City of Rochester v. BriggsNew York Court of Appeals · 1872
  2. State Ex Rel. Brooks v. GullattSupreme Court of Alabama · 1923
  3. State ex rel. Wilkinson v. LaneSupreme Court of Alabama · 1913
  4. Arndt v. City of CullmanSupreme Court of Alabama · 1902
  5. Smoot v. Mayor of WetumpkaSupreme Court of Alabama · 1854

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. Municipal Utilities Bd. of Albertville v. Alabama Power Co.Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 1991
  2. Trailway Oil Company v. City of MobileSupreme Court of Alabama · 1960
  3. City of Leeds v. Town of MoodySupreme Court of Alabama · 1975
  4. Personnel Board of Mobile County v. City of MobileSupreme Court of Alabama · 1955
  5. State Ex Rel. Carter v. HarrisSupreme Court of Alabama · 1961

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API