Legal Opinion

Van De Walker v. State

New York Court of Appeals

Decided October 18, 1938No. Claim 24193; Claim 24195; Claim 24196PublishedCited by 21 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Par Curiam.

The evidence supports the finding that the highway was extraordinarily dangerous at the place of the accident and that it was negligence to fail to re-erect a sign which had been maintained and obliterated prior to the accident in suit.

In each case the judgment of the Appellate Division should be reversed and that of the Court of Claims affirmed, with costs in this court and in the Appellate Division.

Crane, Ch. J., O’Brien, Hubbs, Loughran, Finch and Rippey, JJ., concur; Lehman, J., taking no part.

Judgment accordingly.

2Cited by21 opinions

  1. Weiss v. FoteNew York Court of Appeals · 1960
  2. Firkus v. RombalskiWisconsin Supreme Court · 1964
  3. Canepa v. State of New YorkNew York Court of Appeals · 1954
  4. Nuss v. StateNew York Court of Appeals · 1950
  5. Kelly v. StateAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1977

16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API