Legal Opinion

Ivey v. State

Court of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma

Decided April 15, 1922No. A-3879PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtMatson, J.

(after stating the facts as above). It is first contended that defendant was tried for an indirect contempt of court without any written accusation having been lodged against him. In answer to this assignment of error it is sufficient to state that the record does not support the same. We find in the record a sufficient written accusation lodged against the defendant as a basis for his attachment to show cause in defense of the charge that he had violated the temporary order of injunction theretofore issued in the proceeding.

It is next contended that the demurrer to the state’s evidence…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Ex Parte EldridgeCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · 1910
  2. State v. BatesUtah Supreme Court · 1900
  3. Dix v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · 1919

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Utah Power & Light Co. v. Richmond Irr. Co.Utah Supreme Court · 1932
  2. Hall v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · 1940
  3. Hamit v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · 1929
  4. Quinton v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · 1932
  5. Ivey v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · 1924

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API