Legal Opinion

Forsey v. Hale

Utah Supreme Court

Decided August 13, 1962No. 9585PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

CROCKETT, Justice.

Plaintiff Lorenzo C. Forsey, surviving husband, sues E. Girard Hale, the son by a prior marriage, beneficiary under the will, and executor of the estate of Mabel Bean Forsey for the reimbursement of $1,205.41 expenses incident to her last illness.

The expenses referred to were paid directly to the doctor and hospital by the Lincoln National Life Insurance Company pursuant to an employee’s group insurance policy issued to the plaintiff covering medical and hospitalization benefits for him and his dependents. Upon the presentation of these facts and the certificate of…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. The "Atlas."Supreme Court of the United States · 1876
  2. Anderson v. Industrial CommissionUtah Supreme Court · 1945
  3. Dunn v. WallingfordUtah Supreme Court · 1916
  4. In Re Mower's EstateUtah Supreme Court · 1937

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Forsey v. HaleUtah Supreme Court · 1963
  2. Ottley v. HillUtah Supreme Court · 1968
  3. Ottley v. HillUtah Supreme Court · 1968

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API