Platnauer v. Superior Court
California Court of Appeal
APPLICATION originally made to the District Court of Appeal for the Third Appellate District to strike out a memorandum of costs incurred in a contempt proceeding. The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.
1Opinion of the CourtBurnett, J.
A judgment was rendered by said superior court finding petitioner guilty of contempt and, upon petition to this court, said judgment was set aside upon the ground that the conduct of petitioner was not such as to justify said finding. (Platnauer v. Superior Court of Sacramento County, 32 Cal. App. 463, [163 Pac. 237].) Petitioner thereupon filed in this court a memorandum of his costs incurred in the above-entitled proceeding which respondent has moved the court to strike out “upon the ground that the decision and judgment of the court in said matter did not award costs to the petitioner, and…
2Cases cited2 opinions
- Platnauer v. Superior CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1917
- State ex rel. Duffard v. WhitakerSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1893
3Cited by7 opinions
- Oksner v. Superior CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1964
- Petersen v. Civil Service BoardCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1924
- Corrigan v. Superior CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1925
- McCarthy v. Superior CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1944
- Lapique v. Superior CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1924
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.