Legal Opinion · Dissent

Spillane v. Katz

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided June 10, 1969Published

1Dissent

McNally, J. (dissenting).

I dissent and vote to affirm. In my judgment, the petitions were properly dismissed, since appellants failed to join candidates who are necessary parties in this proceeding under section 330 of the Election Law. *161None of the candidates whose designating petitions are challenged by appellants was named. None of them was served with the petition and the order to show cause. In a proceeding under section 330 of the Election Law, a candidate whose petition is challenged for any reason is a necessary party. This is a jurisdictional defect and the petition was properly…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Matter of Sherrill v. . O'BrienNew York Court of Appeals · 1907
  2. Matter of DowlingNew York Court of Appeals · 1916
  3. Matter of Swan v. CohenNew York Court of Appeals · 1941
  4. Swan v. CohenNew York Supreme Court · 1941
  5. Mahoney v. LawleyNew York Court of Appeals · 1950

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API