Legal Opinion

Sehy v. Salt Lake City

Utah Supreme Court

Decided July 22, 1912No. 2341PublishedCited by 23 opinions

Appeal from District Court, Third District; Hon. F. G. Loofbourow, Judge. Actiou by Anna Sehy against Salt Lake City. Judgment for plaintiff. Defendant appeals.

1Opinion of the CourtStraup, J.

In the complaint it is alleged that the city negligently obstructed the flow of the waters of Jordan River, and suffered and permitted it to be obstructed, and caused the waters to back up- anid overflow plaintiff’s premises, to her damage. It is alleged the obstruction consisted “of wire and timbers and other material extending across said stream a,t or near” a bridge across the river. The case was tried to the court and a jury, and resulted in a judgment for the plaintiff, from which the defendant appeals.

*537It is not necessary to consider the numerous assignments of error, for we think the…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. O'Donnell v. . City of SyracuseNew York Court of Appeals · 1906
  2. Gillmor v. Salt Lake CityUtah Supreme Court · 1907
  3. A. L. Lakey Co. v. City of KalamazooMichigan Supreme Court · 1904

3Cited by23 opinions

  1. Condemarin v. University HospitalUtah Supreme Court · 1989
  2. Standiford v. Salt Lake City Corp.Utah Supreme Court · 1980
  3. DeBry v. NobleUtah Supreme Court · 1995
  4. Weber, by and Through Weber v. SpringvilleUtah Supreme Court · 1986
  5. NELSON BY AND THROUGH STUCKMAN v. Salt Lake CityUtah Supreme Court · 1996

18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API