Legal Opinion

Christofferson v. All Pure Pool Service of Central California, Inc

District Court, E.D. California

Decided June 16, 2020No. 1:18-cv-01370Unknown

1Opinion

Case 1:18-cv-01370-AWI-SAB Document 96 Filed 06/16/20 Page 1 of 53 1 2 3 4 5 6 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 7 EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 8 9 ROBERT E. CHRISTOFFERSON, et al., Case No. 1:18-cv-01370-AWI-SAB 10 Plaintiffs, FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS RECOMMENDING GRANTING 11 v. PLAINTIFFS’ MOTION FOR ENTRY OF DEFAULT JUDGMENT 12 ALL PURE POOL SERVICE OF CENTRAL CALIFORNIA, INC., et al., (ECF Nos. 81, 82, 83, 84, 85, 90, 92, 93, 94) 13 Defendants. OBJECTIONS DUE WITHIN FOURTEEN 14 DAYS 15 16 Currently before the Court is Plaintiffs’ motion for default judgment filed on May 4, 17 2020. (ECF…

2Cases cited47 opinions

  1. J. Wilkerson v. B. WheelerCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2014
  2. Lavonne BAXTER, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Louis SULLIVAN, M.D., Secretary of Health and Human Services, Defendant-AppelleeCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1991
  3. Johnson v. Georgia Highway Express, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1974
  4. Gary R. Eitel v. William D. McCoolCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1986
  5. Antonio Abrego Abrego v. The Dow Chemical Co Shell Oil Company, D/B/A Shell Chemical Company, and Shell Agricultural Chemical CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2006

42 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API