Legal Opinion

In re Snell

District Court, N.D. California

Decided September 29, 1903No. 4,294PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

DE HAVEN, District Judge.

This is a motion made by Albert Hirschfeld for a modification of the order heretofore made staying proceedings in an action pending in the superior court of the county of Nevada, state of California, entitled “Albert Hirschfeld, Plaintiff, vs. B. F. Snell and J. D. Fleming, Partners under the Firm Name of Snell & Fleming, Defendants.” It appears from the affidavit filed in support of the motion (and the fact is not disputed) that the moving party, who is plaintiff in the action referred to, obtained a valid attachment upon certain property of the bankrupts more than…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Metcalf v. BarkerSupreme Court of the United States · 1902
  2. In re Beaver Coal Co.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1902

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Straton v. NewSupreme Court of the United States · 1931
  2. In re Jersey Island Packing Co.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1905
  3. Morris W. Haft & Bros. v. WellsCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1937
  4. In Re Cherokee Public Service Co.Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1938
  5. Hambley v. . WhiteSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1926

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API